From brusil@snad.ncsl.nist.gov Tue Nov  1 13:01:52 1994
	id AA22661; Tue, 1 Nov 94 13:01:07 EST
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 94 13:01:07 EST
From: Dr. Paul J. Brusil - Consultant  <brusil@snad.ncsl.nist.gov>
Message-Id: <9411011801.AA22661@snad.ncsl.nist.gov>
Subject: NMSIG-94/376 EWSO EGLL POSITION ON LL ENSEMBLES  & MO PROFILES
Status: R


                                              NMSIG-94/376

     EWOS EGLL POSITION ON TAXONOMY & PROPOSALS FOR
    LOWER LAYER MANAGEMENT ENSEMBLES AND MO PROFILES 

Date: Mon, 24 Oct 94 13:09:39 MET
From: "Isabelle VALET, CSAC Europe @VBO, DTN 828-5370" <valet@taec.enet.dec.com>
TApparently-To: ewos-egnm@external.iihe.rtt.be
Subject: EWOS/EGLL commments on NM/SIG-94/354 and 94/357
 
From:   DECPRL::"magnus@VNET.IBM.COM" "Magnus Stallknecht" 13-OCT-1994 20:43:51.
91
To:     kk@arinc.com, valet@prl.dec.com, fred.burg@att.com, Wada@focs.sumiden.co
.jp, osamu@isl.ntt.jp, ewos-egll@external.iihe.rtt.b
CC:
Subj:   EWOS/EGLL commments on NM/SIG-94/354 and 94/357
 
Attached please find a liaison statement on management ensembles
and managed object taxonomy which was developed at the October 1994
meeting of EWOS/EGLL. We had the benefit of the editor of the CLNS
Management Ensemble, Kedem Kaminsky, participating in the EWOS/EGLL
meeting. This was very useful for understanding the ongoing
activities an their implications for Lower Layers profiling.
 
Isabelle, please forward to your peer NM groupsas needed, thanks.
 
Best regards,
Magnus Stallknecht, EWOS/EGLL
====================================================================
 
 
                                            EWOS/EGLL/1994/___
 
                                                 TD18R1, 10/94
 
Date:  October 12, 1994
 
To:    EWOS/EGNM (Isabelle Valet)
 
cc:    OIW/LLSIG (Fred Burg)
       AOW/LAN-SIG (Yutaka Wada)
       AOW/WAN-SIG(Osamu Takahash)
       CLNSME Editor (Kedem Kaminsky)
 
From:  EWOS/EGLL (Magnus Stallknecht)
 
 
Subject:Taxonomy and proposals for lower layer management ensembles
         and managed object profiles
 
 
Ref. 1:  OIW/NMSIG-94/357,
         Taxonomy for Lower Layer Ensemble and Managed Object Profiles
         (attached for information)
 
Ref. 2:  OIW/NMSIG-94/354,
         Working Draft 8 ISO/IEC XXXXXX :  June 194, International
         Standardized Profile AOM311, OSI Management Communication -
        Management Ensembles - Part 1:  Connectionless Layer Network
         Systems Management Enseble
 
 
 
At its October 1994 meeting the EWOS/EGLL reviewed the OIW
liaison document, NMSIG-94/357, on a proposed taxonomy for
lower layers management ensembles and managed objects.
 
The following comments are numbered to correspond to the
comment numbers in NMSIG-94/357:
 
1. The EGLL agrees with the ollowing AOM taxonomy:
 
   AOM, OSI Management
     AOM1, Management Communications
     AOM2, Management Function
     AOM3, Management Ensembles
       AOM31, Ensembles for management of OSI Lower Layers
          AOM311, Lower Layers Systems and Network Management
             Ensemble for TA/RA/RD ISPs
          AOM312, LowerLayers Systems and Network Management Ensemble
             for TB/TC/TD/TE/RB/RC/RD ISPs
 
2. EWOS EGLL agrees that the T and R ISPs should refer to
   management capabilities.
 
   The EGLL views management as it does security and routing.
   Security and routing ISP parts are optional capabilities
   referenced by a asic ISP. The following diagram
   illustrates the ISP structure when it references optional
   anagement, security, and routing capabilities:
 
 
    TA or RA ISP:
 
     +---------+
     |        |
     |         |  <---  Managed object ISP parts
     |         |
     |         |  <---  Security capability ISP parts
     |         |
     |         |  <---  Dynamic routeing capability ISP parts
     |         |
     +---------+
 
 
3. EGLL proposes that lower layer managed object profile parts
   be developed as ISP parts inthe existing TA, RA and RD
   profiles series, and not as FOM specifications. The EGLL
   agrees tat the FOM taxonomy is a feasible alternative.
   EGLL proposes that the lower layer managed object ISP parts
   be structured in a manner equivalent to security and
   routing ISP parts. Lower layer security and routing
   capabilities are described in ISP parts. EGLL is of the
   opinion that loer layer management capacities also be
   described in ISP parts. In addition, EGLL recommends
  grouping of managed object requirements into those
   requirements that are common to severalor all profiles,
   and those that are specific to particular profiles. Such
   grouping would inimize duplicate text and be consistent
   with current practice for multi-part lower layers ISPs. The
   following diagram illustrates how the TA51 ISP would
   reference common and specific managed object requirements.
 
     TA51 profile         Managed object specifications
    +----------+
  TL |   TP4    |  <----  Common part for all TL Managed Objects
     |          |  <----  Specific requirements for TP over CLNS
     +----------+
  NL |   ES-IS  |  <----  Common part for all NL Managed Objects
     |   CLNP   |  <----  Specific reqirements for CLNS over LAN
     +----------+
  DLL|  LLC1    |  <----  Common part for all DLL Managd Objects
     | CSMA/CD  |  <----  Specific requirements for LAN
     |          |  <----  Specific requirements for CSMA/CD LAN
     +----------+
 
 The EGLL offers to assist in the grouping of managed objects
 into those that are common and those that are profile specific.
 
 
EWOS/EGLL also briefy reviewed OIW/NMSIG-94/354 (CLNSME.R08)
and found several issues of an editorial nature. A maked-up
version of NMSIG-94/354 was provided to the editor, Kedem
Kaminsky, for his consideration n preparation of the next
draft (CLNSME.R09). EWOS/EGLL expects to receive a revised
draft fr review and comments prior to the January 1995
meeting of EWOS/EGLL.
 


============ END OF EWOS/EGLL LIAISON ==========================
 
 
Attached                                        NMSIG-94/357
 
 
          To: OIW SNMSIG  (nmsigxics.uci.edu)
              OIW LLSIG   (oiw-llsigxosi.ncsl.nist.gov)
              EWOS EGNM   (ewos-egnmxextenal.iiag.ac.ve)
              EWOS LLSIG  (magnusxvnet.ibm.com)
              AOW  NMSIG  (aownmsigxstc.ipa.go.jp)
              AOW  LLSIG
          CC: Ted Lanberg, OIW Chair (landbergxsst.ncsl.nist.gov
              Brenda Gray, OIW Secretariat (bgrayxsst.ncsl.nist.gov)
              Teresa Bolton, OIW Secretariat
                 (boltonxsst.ncsl.nist.gov)
 
 
          From: OIW Systmm and Network Management SIG (SNMSIG)
          (Contact: Kedem Kaminsky
                    2551 Riva Road
                    Annapolis, Md.  21401
                    USA
                    EMAIL: kkxarinc.com
                    Phone: (410)-266-2989
                    FAX:   (410)-266-4499)
 
          Subject:  Taxonomy for Lower Layer Ensemble and Managed
                    Object Profiles
 
 
        The OIW appreciates EWOS EGNM comments on Ensemble and MO
        Profile Taxonomy.  At the September 94 OIW workshop the OIW
        SNMSIG reviewed the EWOS contribution (NMSIG-94/238) on
        Ensemble and MO Profile taxonomy.  This liaison coveys
        comments of OIW LLSIG, EWOS EGLL, OIW SNMSIG, and EWOS EGNM
        experts identifying other, more desirable, alternatives (other
        than proposed by the RW NM groups) for the Lower Layer
        Ensemble Taxonomy.  The comment numbers correspond to the
        attached EWOS document (NMSIG-94/238).
 
 
        1. The OIW agrees that Ensembles should be developed as a AOM3
        taxonomy.  The OIW also agrees with the proposed AOM3
        taxonomy.  The OIW also agrees that AOM311 should be the
        Connectionless Transport, Network, and Datalink Systems
        Management Ensemble for TA/RA/RD ISP and AOM312 should be the
        Connection Oriented Transport, Network, and Datalink Systems
        Management Ensemble for TB/TB/TC/TD/TE ISPs.  Please note the
        change in title per the AOW comments about the title.
 
        2. The OIW NMSIG is of the opinion the each T and R ISP should
        be updated to include an optional management capability.  The
        Ensemble will make support of the management capability
        mandatory.
 
          Ensemble
          --------
          Y      Y------>  Set of AOM for X.700 capabilities
          Y      Y
          Y      Y------>  Set of ISP for MIB capabilities
          --------
 
 
          T or R ISP
          --------
          Y      Y------>  Management Object Profile (ISP Part)
          Y      Y
          Y      Y------>  T or R resource requirements
          --------
 
 
        3. The OIW is of the opinion that there is no need for the FOM
        taxonomy because the requirements list is derived on from the
        ISP.
 
          An example of how this works is as follows:
 
          Set of MOCS are reference by a   MO Profile
 
          MOCS TL     <-----------        CO TL Objects
          Part A
 
          MOCS ISIS
          PART B
 
          MOCS IDRP
          Part C
 
          MOCS NL     <-----------        CLNS NL Objects
          Part D
 
          MOCS DL     <-----------        CSMA/CD Objects
          Part E
 
 
        A System Management Functions (SMF) requires the use of TL
        MOCS Part A, and NL MOCS part D, and DL MOCS Part E. SMF Y
        requires the use of MOCS IRDP Part C, NL MOCS Part D, and DL
        MOCS Part E. Shown in a diagram:
 
 
          SMF X         SMF Y             SMF Z
          -----         ------            ------
          Y   Y---->A   Y   Y---->C       Y    Y
          Y   Y---->D   Y   Y---->D       Y    Y---->D
          Y   Y---->E   Y   Y---->E       Y    Y---->E
          -----         -----             ------
 
        We can then describe Ensembles in the 4 environments CO, CL,
        CL transport, and convergence.  From a system view we
        envisioned and ensemble to manage one of these environments.
        We described the following diagram:
 
            TA51                          TA53
            ----                          -----
            Y  Y----> SMF X               Y   Y---> SMF X
            Y  Y----> SMF Z   RA          Y   Y---> SMF Y
            Y  Y             ----         Y   Y
            Y  Y-----------> Y  Y-------->Y   Y
            ----             ----         -----
             Y
             Y                             TA53
             Y                            -----
             Y               RD           Y   Y
             Y              -----         Y   Y
             -------------->Y   Y ----->  Y   Y
                            -----         -----
 


=====================================================================
 
 
Attached                    ---------      Begin NMSIG/94-238
 
 
NMSIG-94/238
 
Title:  Comments related to MO Profile/Ensemble taxonomy
 
 
Source: Erik Jonsson (EWOS EG NM)
 
Status: Input to interim meeting on OSI Lower Layer
        Ensembles (Aug. 1994)
 
 
 
        An area that will require some work before the profile
        abstracts for the MO Profiles and Ensembles can be finalised
        is the related taxonomy.  We need to define a general
        structure for the FOM taxonomy and for the AOM3 taxonomy.
        This document contains a first proposal for initial
        discussion.
 
 
Taxonomy for FOM
----------------
 
        FOM profiles (Managed Object Profiles) can be expected for a
        variety of resources in the future.  The taxonomy should give
        room for extensions in the future, but at the same time
        provide short taxonomy identifiers for ease of reference.
 
        In this proposal, actual profiles are marked with a (*) to
        separate the profiles from the taxonomy structure
 
 
          FOM - Managed Object Profiles
 
          FOM1 - MO Profiles related to Management Support Objects
          -- This branch could be used for FOM profiles related
             to management support objects (such as Security,
             Performance, Testing) if we choose to develop FOM
             profiles instead of AOM2x profiles.
 
          FOM2 - MO Profiles related to OSI Lower Layers
 
          FOM21 - Transport Layer MO Profiles
          *FOM211 - Connectionless transport
          *FOM212 - Connection-oriented transport
          FOM22 - Network Layer MO Profiles
          *FOM221 - Connectionless Network layer
          *FOM222 - Connection-oriented Network layer
          *FOM223 - ISIS
          *FOM224 - IDRP
          FOM23 - Data Link Layer MO Profiles
          *FOM231 - ?? *FOM232 - ??
 
         --  Further brances at this level could be used for physical
             layer MO profiles and MO profiles with combinations of Os
             from more than one layer.
 
          FOM3 - MO Profiles related to OSI Upper Layers (including
          OSI Applications)
         -- This branch could be subdivided in different application
            areas (MHS, Directory)
 
 
 
Taxonomy for AOM3
-----------------
 
        AOM3 is expected to be used for all Ensembles published as
        ISPs.  Room must be given for possible extensions in the
        future.  We have no clear picture today on future possible use
        of the AOM3x taxonomy.
 
 
AOM - OSI Management
  AOM1 - Management Communications
 
  AOM2 - Management Function
 
  AOM3 - Management Ensembles
    AOM31 - Ensembles for management of OSI Lower Layers
       *AOM311 - Connectionless environment
       *AOM312 - Connection-oriented environment
 
    AOM32 - Ensembles for management of OSI application
       -  This branch could be used for ensembles related to
          management of complete OSI applications (including any
          management support objects necessary)
 
       -- Further branches could be added for other types of
          ensembles.  Depending on the scope of NM EG/SIGs.  It is
          also possible to open up the use of some brances to other
          organisations (such as NM Forum).
 
======================================================================

